She says, however, that you have to research. To portray Stephanie Plum, her main character correctly, she studied bondsman and their agencies. She got to know cops, rode with them, even carried a loaded gun in her waistband to see how that would feel. Then she tailored the facts she learned to her characters.
I'm looking forward to character development - though instead of a real, cold steely gun, I will use a water pistol with cool water.
Interesting. Doesn't her second paragraph somewhat contradict her first? Was she playing with her parrot or riding with cops? Slight difference, methinks. I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle: she actually did both. The work of those who write about something of which they have absolutely no experience often lacks credibility. And credibility is, after all, what we're after. Isn't it?
ReplyDeleteContradiction? Not really. She DID NOT write about herself, her parrot nor how typing forays. She did write about bounty hunters, mysterious ex-military men and cops. She has no experience in any of these things and her books work to entertain.
ReplyDeleteI like that. I think people who really put themselves in a situation can get a better idea than just imagining would. You'll get details out of the situation that you perhaps wouldn't have thought up before.
ReplyDeleteOnce again, a fine line between our own experiences (every day,real-life experiences) and our field research. Field research is the kind where you actually get involved, instead of sitting at a computer or in the stacks at the library. Does field research then count as our own experience? Hmmm. . . Leave it to Roy to draw our attention to the shadowy gray areas between experience and research:>)
ReplyDeleteRather like 'the ends justify the means', I don't think it matters how you got there as long as you achieve credibilty. For example, I don't think any amount of field research could enable me to write with anything like the intensity of Kimberly's piece this morning! But if I were talented enough, or had enough preactice, I could write something like Betty's excellent piece about an automotive accident.
ReplyDeleteWell, I find as long as you can understand a person, 'get in their shoes' so to speak you can write about them. Before the class I often wrote about a hyperactive blonde haired ninja in a world that doesn't exist and was told I potrayed him so well that I could very well be him. (I'm speaking of Naruto from the show Naruto)
ReplyDeleteGranted, I did indeed watch the show enough that I was able to potray his speak mannorisums and behavior quiet well so I guess that might count as research? (I don't think so, I just consider it that I liked the show. *laugh*)